To me, another advantage of a seperate interface as noted above is the ability to -minimize- that interface. In other words, you can retheme it to JUST show content, in a bald, simple way. No flashy graphics. Rapid loading time means rapid response. If mods have to view the same site as users, they are limited to navigating at the same -speed- as users... which can have certain disadvantages.
Mind, I'm not suggesting levels specifically, per se. You could have a roles system with my suggestion, and name your own "levels" based on saved roles profiles.
But I still think splitting users and managers is wise for security. It works -brilliantly- in MODx.
Ah I see it now Dagorath.
What you need is a better, faster interface for management, which can list / display / edit the content faster and easier. Like better lists, grouping, sorting, filtering, multiple edits, mass operations etc. It's the administration pages. You (we) ideally need more functionality on content, users and system in this section. Like more detailed ajax listings for content, customizable columns, mass find / replace, mass delete etc with multiple selections etc.
Actually the interface is there, it just needs more functionality which should be invented by addons for their own content. The only difference is, content pages, which normal users can see are not prohibited to management, but this can be achieved with role permissions too. And for graphics & html, we can already use a simpler, lighter theme for management.
To me, another advantage of a seperate interface as noted above is the ability to -minimize- that interface. In other words, you can retheme it to JUST show content, in a bald, simple way. No flashy graphics. Rapid loading time means rapid response. If mods have to view the same site as users, they are limited to navigating at the same -speed- as users... which can have certain disadvantages.
Mind, I'm not suggesting levels specifically, per se. You could have a roles system with my suggestion, and name your own "levels" based on saved roles profiles.
But I still think splitting users and managers is wise for security. It works -brilliantly- in MODx.
Ah I see it now Dagorath.
What you need is a better, faster interface for management, which can list / display / edit the content faster and easier. Like better lists, grouping, sorting, filtering, multiple edits, mass operations etc. It's the administration pages. You (we) ideally need more functionality on content, users and system in this section. Like more detailed ajax listings for content, customizable columns, mass find / replace, mass delete etc with multiple selections etc.
Actually the interface is there, it just needs more functionality which should be invented by addons for their own content. The only difference is, content pages, which normal users can see are not prohibited to management, but this can be achieved with role permissions too. And for graphics & html, we can already use a simpler, lighter theme for management.
Is this this address you're using? http://docs.elgg.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&type=signup
This is the one i was using - http://docs.elgg.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&returnto=Main_Page - Let me try this - http://docs.elgg.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&type=signup
Is this this address you're using? http://docs.elgg.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&type=signup
This is the one i was using - http://docs.elgg.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&returnto=Main_Page - Let me try this - http://docs.elgg.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&type=signup
I agree with the statement that elgg needs FORUM. Its not just me... and you. I managed 1000 members... most of them say that the community needs a FORUM feature. I know that group discussion can be a replacement. But thats totally different.
A community needs forum. Period.
we don't need no forums instead of intuition
we don't need no group postings going out of control
no dark sarcasm in the CMS gloom
Elggsters - leave then site users alone
Hey coders - leave them kiddies alone
All in all it'd just another post on the wall
All in all it'd just another post on the wall
"wall" in social networking sites is copyrighted by facebook as an electronic messaging system. You will be hearing from their lawyers shortly
I agree with the statement that elgg needs FORUM. Its not just me... and you. I managed 1000 members... most of them say that the community needs a FORUM feature. I know that group discussion can be a replacement. But thats totally different.
A community needs forum. Period.
we don't need no forums instead of intuition
we don't need no group postings going out of control
no dark sarcasm in the CMS gloom
Elggsters - leave then site users alone
Hey coders - leave them kiddies alone
All in all it'd just another post on the wall
All in all it'd just another post on the wall
"wall" in social networking sites is copyrighted by facebook as an electronic messaging system. You will be hearing from their lawyers shortly
I agree with the statement that elgg needs FORUM. Its not just me... and you. I managed 1000 members... most of them say that the community needs a FORUM feature. I know that group discussion can be a replacement. But thats totally different.
A community needs forum. Period.
we don't need no forums instead of intuition
we don't need no group postings going out of control
no dark sarcasm in the CMS gloom
Elggsters - leave then site users alone
Hey coders - leave them kiddies alone
All in all it'd just another post on the wall
All in all it'd just another post on the wall
"wall" in social networking sites is copyrighted by facebook as an electronic messaging system. You will be hearing from their lawyers shortly
To me, another advantage of a seperate interface as noted above is the ability to -minimize- that interface. In other words, you can retheme it to JUST show content, in a bald, simple way. No flashy graphics. Rapid loading time means rapid response. If mods have to view the same site as users, they are limited to navigating at the same -speed- as users... which can have certain disadvantages.
Mind, I'm not suggesting levels specifically, per se. You could have a roles system with my suggestion, and name your own "levels" based on saved roles profiles.
But I still think splitting users and managers is wise for security. It works -brilliantly- in MODx.
Ah I see it now Dagorath.
What you need is a better, faster interface for management, which can list / display / edit the content faster and easier. Like better lists, grouping, sorting, filtering, multiple edits, mass operations etc. It's the administration pages. You (we) ideally need more functionality on content, users and system in this section. Like more detailed ajax listings for content, customizable columns, mass find / replace, mass delete etc with multiple selections etc.
Actually the interface is there, it just needs more functionality which should be invented by addons for their own content. The only difference is, content pages, which normal users can see are not prohibited to management, but this can be achieved with role permissions too. And for graphics & html, we can already use a simpler, lighter theme for management.
http://docs.elgg.org/wiki/Administration_Manual
I click @
it tries to goto
http://docs.elgg.org/w/index.php?title=Dealing_with_a_problem_user&action=edit
and wham permission error ;-(
You are so right !!!
new developers and hackers will have problems..
Maybe the Docs could have a little section section to warn them that SimpleCache can and will give them trouble if they do not handle it well ;-)
The wiki is locked down and you have to ask permission to edit: "If you are using Elgg and would like to help us with documentation, please get in touch info@elgg.com"
To me, another advantage of a seperate interface as noted above is the ability to -minimize- that interface. In other words, you can retheme it to JUST show content, in a bald, simple way. No flashy graphics. Rapid loading time means rapid response. If mods have to view the same site as users, they are limited to navigating at the same -speed- as users... which can have certain disadvantages.
Mind, I'm not suggesting levels specifically, per se. You could have a roles system with my suggestion, and name your own "levels" based on saved roles profiles.
But I still think splitting users and managers is wise for security. It works -brilliantly- in MODx.
Ah I see it now Dagorath.
What you need is a better, faster interface for management, which can list / display / edit the content faster and easier. Like better lists, grouping, sorting, filtering, multiple edits, mass operations etc. It's the administration pages. You (we) ideally need more functionality on content, users and system in this section. Like more detailed ajax listings for content, customizable columns, mass find / replace, mass delete etc with multiple selections etc.
Actually the interface is there, it just needs more functionality which should be invented by addons for their own content. The only difference is, content pages, which normal users can see are not prohibited to management, but this can be achieved with role permissions too. And for graphics & html, we can already use a simpler, lighter theme for management.
To me, another advantage of a seperate interface as noted above is the ability to -minimize- that interface. In other words, you can retheme it to JUST show content, in a bald, simple way. No flashy graphics. Rapid loading time means rapid response. If mods have to view the same site as users, they are limited to navigating at the same -speed- as users... which can have certain disadvantages.
Mind, I'm not suggesting levels specifically, per se. You could have a roles system with my suggestion, and name your own "levels" based on saved roles profiles.
But I still think splitting users and managers is wise for security. It works -brilliantly- in MODx.
Ah I see it now Dagorath.
What you need is a better, faster interface for management, which can list / display / edit the content faster and easier. Like better lists, grouping, sorting, filtering, multiple edits, mass operations etc. It's the administration pages. You (we) ideally need more functionality on content, users and system in this section. Like more detailed ajax listings for content, customizable columns, mass find / replace, mass delete etc with multiple selections etc.
Actually the interface is there, it just needs more functionality which should be invented by addons for their own content. The only difference is, content pages, which normal users can see are not prohibited to management, but this can be achieved with role permissions too. And for graphics & html, we can already use a simpler, lighter theme for management.
Is this this address you're using? http://docs.elgg.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&type=signup
This is the one i was using - http://docs.elgg.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&returnto=Main_Page - Let me try this - http://docs.elgg.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&type=signup
Is this this address you're using? http://docs.elgg.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&type=signup
This is the one i was using - http://docs.elgg.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&returnto=Main_Page - Let me try this - http://docs.elgg.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&type=signup
Is this this address you're using? http://docs.elgg.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&type=signup
This is the one i was using - http://docs.elgg.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&returnto=Main_Page - Let me try this - http://docs.elgg.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&type=signup
Is this this address you're using? http://docs.elgg.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&type=signup
This is the one i was using - http://docs.elgg.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&returnto=Main_Page - Let me try this - http://docs.elgg.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&type=signup
The link returns me to the homepage as well. Either the post was deleted or it is not accessible to everyone.
Meh this link is incorrect now. Here is the correct link: http://community.elgg.org/mod/groups/topicposts.php?topic=212238&group_guid=212067
The link returns me to the homepage as well. Either the post was deleted or it is not accessible to everyone.
Meh this link is incorrect now. Here is the correct link: http://community.elgg.org/mod/groups/topicposts.php?topic=212238&group_guid=212067
The link returns me to the homepage as well. Either the post was deleted or it is not accessible to everyone.
Meh this link is incorrect now. Here is the correct link: http://community.elgg.org/mod/groups/topicposts.php?topic=212238&group_guid=212067
The link returns me to the homepage as well. Either the post was deleted or it is not accessible to everyone.
Meh this link is incorrect now. Here is the correct link: http://community.elgg.org/mod/groups/topicposts.php?topic=212238&group_guid=212067
The link returns me to the homepage as well. Either the post was deleted or it is not accessible to everyone.
Meh this link is incorrect now. Here is the correct link: http://community.elgg.org/mod/groups/topicposts.php?topic=212238&group_guid=212067
info@elgg.org
Security issues should be reported to security@elgg.org!
©2014 the Elgg Foundation
Elgg is a registered trademark of Thematic Networks.
Cover image by Raül Utrera is used under Creative Commons license.
Icons by Flaticon and FontAwesome.