i am not able to use elgg 2.x yet on my live site because of the lack of stable/TESTED code for it in the form of plugins (including my own) and possibly in some of the core aspects too. whereas even elgg 1.12.x is pretty well tested, stable and supported at present. therefore, i think/feel it is a bit misleading to call 2.x the stable version, since that isn't really what it is and new users may install 2.x and then discover they can't use a lot of the plugins they need because there aren't stable versions of them yet.
if i were to name the two branches, i might go with 'cutting edge' for 2.x and 'stable / LTS' for 1.12.x.
just my two bits ;)
info@elgg.org
Security issues should be reported to security@elgg.org!
©2014 the Elgg Foundation
Elgg is a registered trademark of Thematic Networks.
Cover image by RaĆ¼l Utrera is used under Creative Commons license.
Icons by Flaticon and FontAwesome.
I agree "current" or "latest" would be more applicable than "stable" now that we maintain 2 release branches. Can you make an issue in the Elgg/www.elgg.org repo?
ok steve, sure - the new issue is here: https://github.com/Elgg/Elgg/issues/9770
- Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next
You must log in to post replies.