‘Linked’ Data and ‘Open’ Data
1There is some confusion evident in the way that the terms ‘Linked Data,’ ‘Open Data,’ and ‘Linked Open Data’ are used, often almost interchangeably. SWEO’s ‘Linking Open Data’ project did much to exacerbate this trend, as it grew beyond its original scope to embrace data that were not technically ‘Open.’
2For clarity, ‘Linked Data’ should normally be presumed to respect Berners-Lee’s four rules[1]. ‘Open Data’ is harder to pin down with precision, but could usefully be considered to cover data respecting the terms of the Open Knowledge Definition[2]. This definition comprises 11 clauses providing detail around the core premise that ‘open’ data should be freely available online for use and re-use. A number of licenses[3] have been found to be conformant with the Open Knowledge Definition, and should be used where feasible in order to unambiguously assert that data are being made available for re-use.
31Linked Data may be Open, and Open Data may be Linked, but it is equally possible for Linked Data to carry licensing or other restrictions that prevent it being considered Open, or for Open Data to be made available in ways that do not respect all of Berners-Lee’s rules for Linking. In order to avoid confusion, the terms ‘Linked’ and ‘Open’ should be used with care.
4
info@elgg.org
Security issues should be reported to security@elgg.org!
©2014 the Elgg Foundation
Elgg is a registered trademark of Thematic Networks.
Cover image by Raül Utrera is used under Creative Commons license.
Icons by Flaticon and FontAwesome.